Donate car to charity california

Car donation is the better way to help & support to people who have to need without bothering himself. You are donate the car for remove the old car. It is good alternative for people who have old car by getting rid of an old useless vehicle. With this donation you are also help to other people.

There are no need to a better condition car for donation. Cracked or Broken cars may also donate. You have also other choice to donate money through your old car. There are many social company are make the auction of this type of cars and make the profit. The profit is use in social works. After thecar donation you can get your donation receipt.

There are 20 percent of Poor families are not able to purchase the car. They are spent large budget of their income in transportation. Social companies provide them a car or money through your donation. The poor families are also happy through getting the car or money.

Other benefits of your car donation in California is free towing services offered. In this offer you are not required to take the car at Center for Car Donation. The Center Authorities providing pickup facility to you. They pick up the car from your home.

For the car donation you have to prepare some important documents like insurance & registration and if you do not have the title, the Center Authority provides you duplicate form of title. Donation center also give the facility for donate your car.

At the time of pick up the car the donation center give you the tax form which is very important for you because this tax form is provides tax deduction from your tax. You can ask the picker about the form filling. They are introduce to you about the tax form.

Donation of your car is one of the most rewarding work. When you donate the car, you do support the people who are poor & you shining other’s life by helping poor peoples.

There are many homeless family in California & their children are not able for go to school. By helping this type of peoples you get great blessings from the mouth of poor families.

Your thinking is better than other and your work of car donation will be blessings of God for you.

The act of donating a car to charity is one of the most rewarding things you can do. When you donate your car, you do more than just support a charity. You actually help to improve someone's life. To help a needy person, please donate a car to one of these respected charities inCalifornia.

Established in 1946 in Davis, California, Freedom From Hunger has been fighting chronic hunger and poverty in the world through innovative programs designed to help families achieve long term food security. Their programs are serving over 18 million people in some of the poorest countries in the world. They are both nongovernmental and nonsectarian and they have been given an A- rating from the American Institute of Philanthropy.

Teach for America works to ensure that children in low income areas get an excellent education. Less than half of the children in California are on grade level for reading and math, and it ranks 48th in academic performance. In the Bay Area, Teach for America has been providing great education for over 10 years. In Los Angeles, they have operating since 1990. Teach for America works to recruit leaders who work to expand educational opportunities in low income areas and then teach for two years in those areas.

The Guthy Jackson Charitable Foundation is dedicated to the treatment and a cure for neuromyelitis optica. NMO is a very rare disease that can affect the optic nerve and spinal cord. People with this horrible disease can develop vision loss, or weakness, numbness, and sometimes paralysis of the arms and legs along with sensory disturbances and loss bladder and bowel control. Although there are some treatments available a lot more research is needed to find better ones and a cure.

A Home Away From Homelessness is dedicated to supporting and nurturing the needs of homeless and formerly homeless children and families in San Francisco and Marin. Their homes provide a physical, emotional and spiritual break for children along with educational, social and recreational opportunities.

Family Builders believes that every child has the right to grow up in a permanent, nurturing family regardless of the child's age, race, ethnicity, gender, religion, sexual orientation, or medical, physical or emotional condition. Family Builders educates the community about the needs of waiting children, advocates on their behalf and places the children with permanent, secure families through adoption.

The car donation process is easy and the pickup is free. You can donate your car even it no longer runs or is in poor shape. You just need to have a title for your car and it needs to be where the tow truck can easily get to it. In return for your car donation, you will get a valuable tax deduction and a sense of pride knowing you have done a really good thing. For complete details on how to donate car, please call 1-866-4483487.

Have you recently purchased a new car and are having problems with your old one? You don't know where to park them? Well, one good way of disposing these old vehicles is to donate them. The best place for car donation is the state of California.

Car donation in California is a famous alternative for those who have old vehicles. Car owners can donate their vehicles including vans, cars, boats and other types of vehicles to a charity of their choice. This is one good way of getting rid of an old useless vehicle. In addition, you are able to help those who are in need without bothering yourself about what to do with that car.

The vehicle does not need to be in very good condition to be donated. In fact, broken down cars may also be donated. These centers would tow the broken cars for free. They will then fix these and auction them for a profit. The money earned from the auction will be given to the charity of your own choice.

Another way of donating automobile is by giving it to a poor family. According to the research done by Surface Transportation Policy Project (STPP), a non-profit agency, 20 percent of the American poor families can not buy a car. They are spending 40.2 percent of their budget with transportation expenses. STPP conducts a study about transportation alternative choices of Americans.

There are advantages in donating your ride in California. In other states, you are required to have the original title in order to donate. This is not the case here. In fact, as long as you are the legal owner of the car, you can still donate. The Center for Car Donations would provide you with a duplicate title form to be signed. On the other hand, car donors are entitled to a tax deduction. This is in accordance with the new tax law of 2005. In some cases, you are given a free vacation for your act of charity.

Another benefit of donating car in California is the free towing services offered. You're not required to bring the car to the Center for Car Donations. They are ready to pick it up especially if it is not in good running condition anywhere within the state.

You simply follow steps in giving out your car. First, prepare the vehicle. While it is not necessary for the car to be in good running condition, it would still be good if you make sure that it is presentable enough. Simply clean it and make sure you have nothing of your personal belongings left inside.

You also need to prepare all the important documents like registration and insurance. If you don't have the title, the Center for Car donation would provide you with a duplicate title form. After gathering all the documents to be transferred, make an online search for car donation companies that would facilitate your car donation. Make sure that the company is valid before submitting all the documents. This would prevent you from falling victim of scams.

When the car is picked up, the company would give you a tax form. This is important for you to avail of tax deduction. Make sure to file a notice of release of liability to a local Department of Motor Vehicle (DMV). Ask the people who picked up your car on how to fill out the form. Lastly, inform your insurance company that you donated your car to charity. Do this on the day you release your car. This is important for them so they can discontinue the insurance coverage.

Detroit Electric Model 01 by fledgling Detroit manufacturers developing Electric designed with sporty, 2-seat. Many people will be easily recognized by its stylish design to the Lotus Elise cars in the UK, simply because a lot of key positions in the company has been working for Lotus.

As announced by the manufacturer, SP: 01 can accelerate from 0 to 100 km / h in 3.7 seconds before reaching a top speed of 249 km / h. In particular, SP: 01 can be moved continuously over distances more than 300 km per charge only battery lasts about 4.3 hours.

Detroit Electric said they only produce 999 units SP: 01 for sale to consumers is £ 90,000, equivalent to 2.88 billion. When sold, the main rival SP: 01 will be the Fisker Automotive and Tesla Roadster particularly billionaire Elon Musk. Telsa Roadster has a maximum speed of 201 km / h.

Mesothelioma Law Firm

School Closings: Most area schools closed Thursdday

List of Thursday school and program closures due to weather:

• Algonac Community Schools
• Blue Water Choices - Life Skills centers
• Brown City Schools
• Capac Community Schools
• Capac Senior Center
• Cardinal Mooney Catholic High School
• Carsonville-Port Sanilac Schools
• Community Enterprises
• Council on Aging
• Croswell-Lexington Community Schools
• Deckerville School District
• East China School District 
• Eastshore Leadership Academy
• Ennis Center for Child Port Huron
• Immaculate Conception Elementary in Ira Township
• Landmark Academy
• Life Skills Bright Futures
• Life Skills Opportunities
• Marlette School District
• Marysville Public Schools
• Memphis Community Schools
• New Life Christian Academy
• Peck Community Schools
• Port Huron Schools 
• Port Huron Senior Center
• Sandusky Community Schools
• Sanilac Career Center
• Sanilac Special Education/Sanilac Intermediate School District
• St. Clair County Community College
• St. Clair TEC
• St. Edward on the Lake 
• St. Mary's Catholic School in St. Clair
• St. Mary/McCormick Catholic Academy
• Trinity Lutheran Pre-school
• Washington Life Center
• Woodland Developmental Center
• Yale School District
• Yale Senior Center
• St. Clair County Community Mental Health will be open today, but the agency's CIS program will be closed and no agency transportation will be available. Employees should report to work.
  Check back for continued school closing updates.
• to get more latest news like our fb pagehttps://www.facebook.com/News-latest-news-media-hub-1513612188943374/?ref=aymt_homepage_panel

Humiliation: JebBush.com redirects to Trump’s official website

The battle between Jeb “Jeb!” Bush and Donald Trump has been one of the most intense of this presidential primary season. While The Donald has scored a lot of direct hits on Jeb for being a “low-energy” candidate, Jeb hasn’t been shy about hitting back at his doughy billionaire rival. However, it looks like some Trump supporter out there badly owned Bush’s campaign by buying up the web domainJebBush.com and having it redirect to Trump’s official campaign website.

Presidential campaigns typically buy up lots of domain names related to their candidates before those candidates officially announce their intention to run. The reason they do this is obvious: They don’t want rivals or random Internet trolls to buy up the domains and use them to create parody websites that make their candidates look ridiculous.

Remarkably, it seems the Bush campaign never bothered to buy up JebBush.com. This wasn’t a big deal for a while because until last fall going to the web address would produce a blank page. Sometime late in the year, however, the website’s owner made it start redirecting to Trump’s presidential campaign page.

Vox says that Trump’s campaign denies that its behind this particular prank, which makes sense. After all, Trump’s supporters on the web are definitely what I would describe as “high-energy” people who are more than capable of doing something like this on their own. This doesn’t make this oversight any less embarrassing for the Bush campaign, however.

like our fb page to get latest news

https://www.facebook.com/News-latest-news-media-hub-1513612188943374/?ref=hl

Alexander Hamilton

Alexander Hamilton, a delegate to the Constitutional Convention and major author of the Federalist papers, was the United States' first secretary of the treasury.

Synopsis

Alexander Hamilton was born circa January 11, 1755 or 1757 (the exact date is unknown), on the island of Nevis, British West Indies. In 1777, Hamilton became General George Washington's assistant. In 1788, he convinced New Yorkers to agree to ratify the U.S Constitution. He then served as the nation's first secretary of the treasury, from 1789 to 1795. On July 12, 1804, in New York City, Hamilton died of a gunshot wound that he sustained during a duel with Aaron Burr.

Early Life

Founding Father Alexander Hamilton was born circa January 11, 1755 or 1757 (the exact date is unknown), on the island of Nevis in the British West Indies. Hamilton was the product of an adulterous affair. His mother, a Frenchwoman named Rachel Fawcett Lavine, was married to someone else when Hamilton was born.

When Rachel's husband threw her out of the house, she moved in with Hamilton's father, a Scottish trader named James. But the living arrangement did not last long. James abandoned the family when Hamilton was still a baby, leaving him and his mother impoverished. John Adams would one day come to illustrate Hamilton's rise from humble beginnings by describing the young Hamilton as "the bastard brat of a Scottish peddler."

Determined to improve his lot in life, Hamilton took his first job at the tender age of 11. Working as a clerk in an accounting firm in St. Croix, the bright and ambitious young lad quickly impressed his employer. Hamilton's boss, businessman Nicolas Cruger, pooled his resources with a minister named Hugh Knox to send Hamilton to America for an education.

In 1773, when he was around 16 years old, Hamilton arrived in New York, where he enrolled in King's College (later renamed Columbia University). Despite his gratitude toward his generous patrons, with the American colonies on the brink of a revolution, Hamilton was drawn more to political involvement than he was to academics. In 1774, he wrote his first political article defending the Patriots' cause against the interests of pro-British Loyalists.

A quick learner, Hamilton deemed himself quite capable of becoming a self-made man. Intent on learning through hands-on experience, he left King's College before graduating to join forces with the Patriots in their protest of British-imposed taxes and commercial business regulations.

Military Career

In 1775, when the Revolutionary War began, Hamilton became part of the New York Provincial Artillery Company and fought in the battles of Long Island, White Plains and Trenton.

In 1777, after Hamilton fought in that year's battles of Brandywine Creek, Germantown and Princeton, he was promoted to lieutenant colonel of the Continental Army. During his early service in the fight for American independence, he caught the attention of General George Washington, who made Hamilton his assistant and trusted adviser. For the next five years, Hamilton put his writing skills to work. He wrote Washington's critical letters, and composed numerous reports on the strategic reform and restructuring of the Continental Army. Around the same time, Hamilton married Elisabeth Schuyler, who was from an affluent New York family.

Growing restless in his desk job, in 1781, Hamilton convinced Washington to let him taste some action on the battlefield. With Washington's permission, Hamilton led a victorious charge against the British in the Battle of Yorktown. Cornwallis's surrender during this battle would eventually lead to two major negotiations in 1783: the Treaty of Paris between the United States and Great Britain, and two treaties signed at Versailles between France and Britain and Spain (not to be confused with the 1919 peace treaty ending World War I). These treaties and several others comprise the collection of peace agreements known as Peace of Paris, officially marking the end of the American Revolutionary War.

While serving as an adviser for George Washington, Hamilton had come to realize Congress' weaknesses, including jealousy and resentment between states, which, Hamilton believed, stemmed from the Articles of Confederation. (He believed that the Articles -- considered America's first, informal constitution -- separated rather than unified the nation.) Hamilton left his adviser post in 1782, convinced that establishing a strong central government was the key to achieving America's independence. It would not be the last time that Hamilton worked for the U.S. Army.

In 1798, Hamilton was appointed inspector general and second in command, as America geared up for a potential war with France. In 1800, Hamilton's military career came to a sudden halt when America and France reached a peace agreement.

Law Career

Hamilton left his position as an adviser to George Washington to study law. After completing a short apprenticeship and passing the bar, he established a practice in New York City. The majority of Hamilton's first clients were the widely unpopular British Loyalists, who continued to pledge their allegiance to the King of England. When British forces took power over New York State in 1776, many New York rebels fled the area, and British Loyalists, many of whom had traveled from other states and were seeking protection during this time, began to occupy the abandoned homes and businesses.

When the Revolutionary War ended, nearly a decade later, many rebels returned to find their homes occupied, and sued Loyalists for compensation (for using and/or damaging their property). Hamilton defended Loyalists against the rebels.

In 1784, Hamilton took on the Rutgers v. Waddington case, which involved the rights of Loyalists. It was a landmark case for the American justice system, as it led to the creation of the judicial review system. He accomplished another history-making feat that same year, when he assisted in founding the Bank of New York. In defending the Loyalists, Hamilton instituted new principles of due process.

Hamilton went on to take an additional 45 trespass cases, and proved to be instrumental in the eventual repeal of the Trespass Act, which had been established in 1783 to permit rebels to collect damages from the Loyalists who had occupied their homes and businesses.

Being a lawyer drew Hamilton further into politics, as he used his profession as a vehicle for achieving his political goals. After serving as secretary of the treasury from 1789 to 1795, he returned to his law practice in Manhattan, distinguishing himself as one of the city's most prestigious attorneys. Throughout his law career, Hamilton remained actively involved in public and political affairs and ranked among U.S. presidents' most sought-after advisors.

The Walking Dead showrunner Scott M. Gimple on that big death and even bigger injury

Good news! The folks of Alexandria fought off the zombies! But that was only after the entire Anderson family was devoured and one of our major characters suffered a critical, life- (and vision-) threatening injury. As teased in December’s midseason finale, young Sam indeed starting freaking out, immediately drawing zombies upon him. This caused a chain reaction which included Jessie then being eaten, Rick having to chop off Jessie’s hand when she would not let go of Carl, Ron trying to shoot Rick, Michonne stabbing Ron, and then Ron inadvertently shooting Carl in the face.

Denise saved Carl’s life, but not his right eye. So, you know, that was the bad news. We caught up with showrunner Scott M. Gimple to get his take on this pivotal episode, and he revealed the biggest mystery of all — the name of that seemingly nameless Wolf guy. (Click through both pages to read the entire interview. Also make sure to read our midseason premiere Q&As with Walking Dead creator Robert Kirkman, director Greg Nicotero, and actress Alexandra Breckenridge. And for more Walking Deadscoop all season long, follow me on Twitter@DaltonRoss.)

ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: Was there ever any scenario once you cast Alex Breckenridge as Jessie that the character was going to survive after this point?
SCOTT M. GIMPLE: I would say anything is possible, but no. The story was the story, and we were going to follow the story, more of less, of the book. That said, if a meteor hit the earth, and you know, huge changes happened throughout our society, you never know. I will say, Alexandra is such a talented actress who is so wonderful to work with that sometimes I was hoping for that meteor because she’s fantastic. But yeah, from the beginning we were intending on telling the story from the comic. I guess if there was any sort of variable is that the sooner or later of it might’ve come into play.

The same act of Rick chopping her hand off to leave her with the zombies and free Carl, but you’re just saying it might’ve happened at a different point?
Yeah, I would think so. And you know, sometimes things get mixed up as well. I mean, I’m talking extremely theoretically. The plan was to tell the story from the book. I will say just talking to you now, it would’ve been interesting if it was the converse, if it was Jessie to Rick rather than Rick to Jessie.

That would even some things with the comic with Rick finally losing his hand.
Exactly! It would be sort of a very aggressive homage. And maybe she’s wearing an eye patch too. Would’ve been great.

Then sort of knowing that her fate in a sense was sealed when she was cast because she had this huge moment from the comic that we know about, when and how then did you deliver the bad news to her that this was happening?
I will say that there’s a lot of characters that I knew a long time before they would go, and I’m always just try to figure out when is the best time and what’s both the most considerate for them and also leaves room open for things to change in the show, especially the timing. So, you know, I kept in pretty close contact with Alexandra about it, but I don’t want to get into the details too much.

You had the moment right before Rick does the big chop-chop move where he’s having these flashbacks to all these happy Jessie moments, and you guys don’t do that much if at all. So talk about that decision, because that certainly is not something that we’re used to seeing on the show.
Yeah, I’m glad you bring that up. It was a very impressionistic moment, certainly inspired by a certain style of filmmaking from the ‘70s that was something [director Greg Nicotero] and I talked about. It was such an intense moment. It was so emotional, and difficult, and horrific in every aspect of the horrific thing inflicted upon the other person is by someone who really doesn’t want to do it, but needs to do it. And those flashes in many ways I felt even heightened what was happening.

It reminded the audience that they were human beings under that pile and that the context of their relationship — there was such an urgency to what Rick was doing. We wanted to contrast that in an emotional and horrific way as it all was happening to heighten your emotion. We do like to employ impressionistic and sort of experimental moments in filmmaking.

I love that because it’s just yet another way to give the audience a new experience. We don’t want to give an inch as far as letting go of an opportunity to enhance the experience for the audience, and that does take experimentation. It does mean taking risks, and we’re always going to do that for the audience, and I will say that we’re on a network where the DNA is about giving the audience a cinematic experience, and that’s what we try to do, and we’re very lucky that we landed where we did.

Supreme court justice Antonin Scalia dies: legal and political worlds react

Antonin Scalia, the staunchly conservative supreme court justice, has died at the age of 79, prompting an immediate political struggle over the future direction of the United States, even as tributes were being paid to honor his service.

Related: Antonin Scalia is gone – now an epic political battle looms large

As the stars and stripes were lowered to half-staff outside the court, and the chief justice, John Roberts, confirmed Scalia’s death, political leaders on both sides of the partisan divide staked out their positions in the fierce fight to come over the nomination of his replacement.

President Obama praised Scalia as a “brilliant legal mind” who was “one of the towering legal figures of our time” and “one of the most consequential judges and thinkers to serve on the supreme court”.

But in a brief statement on Saturday night, he also responded to Republican threats to block Scalia’s replacement by warning they risked undermining a cornerstone of US democracy.

“I plan to fulfill my constitutional responsibility to nominate a successor in due time,” he said, during a weekend trip to Palm Springs. Obama, who is in the final year of his presidency, said: “There will be plenty of time for me to do so and for the Senate to to fulfill its responsibility to give that person a fair hearing and a timely vote.”

“These are responsibilities that I take seriously, as should everyone, they are bigger than any one party; they are about our democracy. They are about the institution to which justice Scalia dedicated his professional life and making sure it continues to function as the beacon of justice that our founders envisaged.”

Before Obama spoke, Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell said the next president should be the one to nominate a replacement to a court which is now evenly balanced between four liberal and four conservative justices.

With issues ranging from immigration reform and climate change on the court’s agenda – and issues like abortion and gun control being fought over in the lower courts – the next appointment is pivotal.

The president’s nomination must be passed with the votes of at least 60 of the 100 members of the Republican-controlled Senate.

McConnell’s statement followed a more rancorous outburst from Conn Carroll, communications director for Mike Lee of Utah, a Tea Party-backed member of theSenate judiciary committee. Carroll used Twitter to say: “What is less than zero? The chances of Obama successfully appointing a supreme court justice to replace Scalia?”

He added: “If anything this will put a full stop to all Obama judicial nominees going forward.”

Prior to their debate in South Carolina on Saturday night, Republican presidential candidates followed suit. The Texas senator Ted Cruz, a leading contender who clerked in the supreme court while Scalia was on the bench, said on Twitter: “Justice Scalia was an American hero. We owe it to him, [and] the nation, for the Senate to ensure that the next president names his replacement.”

Like other candidates, Cruz has used fiery rhetoric about the court and conservative touchstones while on the campaign trail. In Iowa recently, prior to winning the state’s caucus by capturing the evangelical vote, he said: “We are one justice away from the supreme court taking away every single restriction on abortion and mandating abortion on demand … up to the moment of birth.”

From the Democratic side of the Senate, Patrick Leahy of Vermont, the ranking Democrat on the judicial committee, issued a sharply worded rebuke.

Saying he was saddened by the death of Scalia “although I often did not agree with his legal opinions”, Leahy continued: “I hope that no one will use this sad news to suggest that the president or the Senate should not perform its constitutional duty.

“The American people deserve to have a fully functioning supreme court. The supreme court of the United States is too important to our democracy for it to be understaffed for partisan reasons. It is only February. The president and the Senate should get to work without delay to nominate, consider and confirm the next justice to serve on the supreme court.”

The presidential candidate Hillary Clinton went further, saying: “The Republicans in the Senate and on the campaign trail who are calling for Justice Scalia’s seat to remain vacant dishonor our constitution. The Senate has a constitutional responsibility here that it cannot abdicate for partisan political reasons.”

McConnell, however, is likely to point to the so-called “Thurmond rule” as precedent for his attempt to block confirmation. This non-binding Senate tradition of resisting supreme court appointments in the final months of a presidency dates from Senator Strom Thurmond’s opposition to a court nomination by Lyndon Johnson in 1968.

The White House will no doubt argue that nine months before an election is a period of time that falls outside even this somewhat vague rule.

More importantly, both sides will be eyeing the pending court decision on Obama’s immigration action, which could be blocked indefinitely if there was a 4-4 split on the court.

The president’s unilateral move to allow millions of undocumented immigrants to avoid deportation was first challenged by a Texas court and upheld by a federal appeals court, whose ruling will stand if the supreme court cannot decide one way or another.

While the Thurmond rule would not provide the definitive victory Republicans once hoped for, anything that prevents what they see as immigration “amnesty” from taking root before Obama leaves would be worth dragging heels for

The San Antonio Express News reported that Scalia was found dead on Saturday morning at a ranch in the Big Bend region of Texas, south of Marfa, and said he had been discovered to have died after not attending a breakfast. Local ABC affiliate KVIA reported that Scalia died in his sleep after a day of quail hunting.

The news prompted mourning from conservatives, honors from attorneys and a mix of respectful comment, unreserved scorn and and political bickering among everyone else – a reflection of the colorful supreme court justice’s power to polarize the country.

Scalia was appointed to the court in 1986, by President Ronald Reagan, as the first Italian American to serve on the high court. He was born in Trenton, New Jerseyin 1936 and brought up in New York City. From private practice and academia, he entered public service during the Nixon administration, and became an appeals court judge under Reagan.

His written rulings and opinions, often expressed in witty yet forthright terms,divided observers and infuriated liberals. He dissented, for example, in the 2015 case which legalised same-sex marriage across the US. He also caused controversy with comments about race and healthcare.

Jim Obergefell, the lead plaintiff in the case that made same-sex marriage legal around the US last year – a decision for which Scalia made a vitriolic dissent –tweeted his condolences. “Thank you for your service to our country, Justice Scalia,” he wrote. “Condolences to your family and friends.”

Chief justice Roberts quickly noted his admiration for the late judge, who was close if unlikely friends with the liberal justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and their fellows on the court. Scalia was an “extraordinary individual and jurist, admired and treasured by his colleagues”, Roberts said.

“His passing is a great loss to the country and the court he served.”

Governor Greg Abbott of Texas, a strongly conservative Republican, issued a statement that dripped with conservative priorities and rhetoric.

“Justice Antonin Scalia was a man of God, a patriot, and an unswerving defender of the written constitution and the rule of law,” he said.

“He was the solid rock who turned away so many attempts to depart from and distort the Constitution. His fierce loyalty to the Constitution set an unmatched example, not just for judges and lawyers, but for all Americans.”

Republican presidential contenders paid tribute. In a statement, a spokeswoman for Donald Trump, the frontrunner, said: “Justice Scalia was a remarkable person and a brilliant supreme court justice, one of the best of all time.

“His career was defined by his reverence for the constitution and his legacy of protecting Americans’ most cherished freedoms.”

Senator Marco Rubio said: “One of the greatest honors in my life was to attend oral arguments during Town of Greece v Galloway and see Justice Scalia eloquently defend religious freedom. I will hold that memory forever.”

Cruz indicated his own conservative stance on how the constitution should be interpreted when he said: “As liberals and conservatives alike would agree, through his powerful and persuasive opinions, Justice Scalia fundamentally changed how courts interpret the constitution and statutes, returning the focus to the original meaning of the text after decades of judicial activism.”

Cruz also called Scalia’s time on the court “one of President Reagan’s most consequential legacies”, and said: “Our prayers are with his beloved wife Maureen, their nine children, and their precious grandchildren.”

Jeb Bush, the former governor of Florida, said Scalia’s “logic and wit were unparalleled, and his decisions were models of clarity and good sense”. His brother, former president George W Bush, said Scalia was a “towering figure and important judge”.

On the Democratic side of the ledger, Senator Bernie Sanders said: “While I differed with Justice Scalia’s views and jurisprudence, he was a brilliant, colorful and outspoken member of the supreme court.”

Chuck Schumer, the influential senator from New York, said Scalia had been “a great son of Queens with a genuine joy for life”.

The somber tone of elected officials was not uniformly reflected in the general public. The journalist Glenn Greenwald summed up the mood among many critics of the justice in a tweet: “Don’t even try to enforce the inapplicable don’t-speak-ill-of-the-dead ‘rule’ for the highly polarizing, deeply consequential Antonin Scalia.”